Medical Information Center

Google


1 kg-omer (yes, it's Andrew's 2PD-omer)

  Read more
Yes, I'm really excited about venturing into this new way of eating. Bought a good pair of kitchen scales from eBay for just $23 (AUD), and it weighs in both kgs and lbs. Has a feature that weighs the plate or whatever first before putting food on - so accuracy all round.

Started the 1 kg-omer yesterday and was surprised at the amount I could eat. I'm just cutting down the size of my meals and not eating anything I don't normally eat - like going for a 1kg bar of chocolate!

At present I weigh 124 lb (57 kg), but as I'm just 5"1', I'd like to lose 5kg (about 10 lb). Haven't got diabetes, however there's a chance I could get it as my mother and sister both suffered with it. (If suffering is the correct term?).

I had a good dessert today of rice pudding, which I made up myself from scratch, so want to eat as little processed food as possible. Was surprised that my apple weighed 125g and the nice small cake I had with a cuppa weighed only 46g!

Will let you know how I get on.

Blessings, Ros
Ros wrote: Yes, I'm really excited about venturing into this new way of eating.

Not new. Exodus 16:16 happened a long time ago.

16 ounces plus 16 ounces is 32 ounces (aka 2 pounds).

Bought a good pair of kitchen scales from eBay for just $23 (AUD), and it weighs in both kgs and lbs. Has a feature that weighs the plate or whatever first before putting food on - so accuracy all round.

Excellent.

Started the 1 kg-omer yesterday and was surprised at the amount I could eat. I'm just cutting down the size of my meals and not eating anything I don't normally eat - like going for a 1kg bar of chocolate!

GOD has given you HIS wisdom.

At present I weigh 124 lb (57 kg), but as I'm just 5"1', I'd like to lose 5kg (about 10 lb). Haven't got diabetes, however there's a chance I could get it as my mother and sister both suffered with it. (If suffering is the correct term?).

Eating less down to HIS right amount (omer) and being consequently hungrier (blessed by GOD) will mean that GOD will make you leaner and trimmer. HE is the Potter, we are just HIS lumps of clay :-)

"Blessed are you who hunger now, for you will be satisfied." -- LORD Jesus Christ (Luke 6:21)

When you find yourself unable to put up with hunger in between and after smaller meals, simply heed HIS words:

"I have food to eat that you know nothing about. MY food is to do the will of HIM who sent ME and to finish HIS work." -- LORD Jesus Christ (John 4:32-34)

.... and go finds things to do instead of things to eat.

I had a good dessert today of rice pudding, which I made up myself from scratch, so want to eat as little processed food as possible. Was surprised that my apple weighed 125g and the nice small cake I had with a cuppa weighed only 46g!

You were blind and now you see !

Only LORD GOD Almighty can give the blind vision ! ! !

HeartMDPhD/healer.asp

Laus Deo !

Will let you know how I get on.

Blessings, Ros

Many thanks and praises to GOD for your kind heart.

Indeed, most assuredly without doubt, LORD GOD Almighty is the source of all knowledge and wisdom, dear friend of GOD.

May our LORD's peace be with you.

Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love,

Andrew B. Chung Cardiologist, Atlanta, Georgia, USA HeartMDPhD/HolySpirit
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote: Ros wrote:

Yes, I'm really excited about venturing into this new way of eating.

Not new. Exodus 16:16 happened a long time ago.

The 16:16 chapter labeling happened when the Bible was created, not when the events it depicts occurred you fool.

Plus the ounces and pounds you rant about are much more recent than any Biblical events you are so erroneously interpreting.

God must really dislike you to have made you so stupid.

At least he spared you the pain of recognising your own idiocy, but unfortunately he didn't spare us in the same way.

Salty
Salty Dog wrote: Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote: Ros wrote:

Yes, I'm really excited about venturing into this new way of eating.

Not new. Exodus 16:16 happened a long time ago.

The 16:16 chapter labeling happened when the Bible was created, not when the events it depicts occurred you fool.

Plus the ounces and pounds you rant about are much more recent than any Biblical events you are so erroneously interpreting.

God must really dislike you to have made you so stupid.

At least he spared you the pain of recognising your own idiocy, but unfortunately he didn't spare us in the same way.

That Yahweh's sadistic like that Wink
Salty Dog wrote: Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote: Ros wrote:

Yes, I'm really excited about venturing into this new way of eating.

Not new. Exodus 16:16 happened a long time ago.

The 16:16 chapter labeling happened when the Bible was created, not when the events it depicts occurred you fool.

Exodus 16:16 is a verse that describes an event that happened a long time ago.

Plus the ounces and pounds you rant about are much more recent than any Biblical events you are so erroneously interpreting.

If you simply check the subject line, you will see we are discussing GOD's omer.

God must really dislike you to have made you so stupid.

In one word concerning you:

PROJECTION.

At least he spared you the pain of recognising your own idiocy, but unfortunately he didn't spare us in the same way.

No such thing as fortune one way or another (Proverbs 16:33).

Nothing happens by either chance, accident, or coincidence (again Proverbs 16:33).

It was HIS plan from the outset that the numbering of Exodus 16:16 would serve to help us remember that HE designed our bodies and to affirm that 32 ounces is the right amount (omer) of food for everyone.

May GOD heal your heart, dear neighbor.

Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love,

Andrew B. Chung Cardiologist, Atlanta, Georgia, USA HeartMDPhD/HolySpirit
God must really dislike you to have made you so stupid.

At least he spared you the pain of recognising your own idiocy, but unfortunately he didn't spare us in the same way. :shock:

Can we possibly discuss cardiology matters here without resorting to pissing contests? Shocked

Are there any moderators here to regulate this sort of behavior?

Posted via medical forums at medical.gr77
Kevin wrote: Salty Dog wrote: Andrew wrote:

groups.google/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/6931ea34a181ae15? or kyrfu

God must really dislike you to have made you so stupid.

At least he spared you the pain of recognising your own idiocy, but unfortunately he didn't spare us in the same way. :shock:

Can we possibly discuss cardiology matters here without resorting to pissing contests? :shock:

Sorry about what you have witnessed. Please forgive all my iniquities.

Are there any moderators here to regulate this sort of behavior?

This is an unmoderated usenet newsgroup blessed by GOD.

LORD GOD Almighty is the moderator here.

HE values free speech and believes there is no reason to keep folks from writing down what is in their hearts.

Why?

Because HE already knows what is in our hearts.

May GOD heal your heart, dear neighbor Kevin.

Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love,

Andrew B. Chung Cardiologist, Atlanta, Georgia, USA kqtvj
Andrew B. Chung, total fake, wrote:

This is an unmoderated usenet newsgroup blessed by GOD.

Prove that, asshole. Another blatant lie.
In article <eb3bue$fr0$2inews.gazeta.pl>, kevin_abqyahoo-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Kevin) wrote:

God must really dislike you to have made you so stupid.

At least he spared you the pain of recognising your own idiocy, but unfortunately he didn't spare us in the same way. :shock:

Can we possibly discuss cardiology matters here without resorting to pissing contests? :shock:

Are there any moderators here to regulate this sort of behavior?

Posted via medical forums at medical.gr77

You must moderate yourself as this group is not moderated. Sometimes big girls and boys can do that. Sometimes not. I personally do not need regulation I have enough about already. So if you don't like it leave or kill file your offending posts or authors. Be aware of throwing out the baby with the wash water. BUT DO THINK OF SHUTTING US DOWN !!

Never saw you post anything worth keeping.

Bill

-- S Jersey USA Zone 5 Shade This article is posted under fair use rules in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, and is strictly for the educational and informative purposes. This material is distributed without profit.
I expect early one morning or late one night I will turn on the TV and see ABC being "interviewed" by Kevin Trudeau. Is that eating approach outlined in Trudeau's book?
1kg of the average mixed meal without overloading on single nutrients is around 1000 calories. Carbohydrates and protein have about 4 calories per g while fat has a bit over 8 per g. It turns out to be a 1000 calorie diet on average.

One can use any gimmick to achieve that calorie level such as putting the same amount into a container and limiting oneself to that amount or timing oneself to see how long on average it takes to consume the same amount and using that as the calorie limiting factor.

Or one can note that a given sandwich has what calories and what number of ladles of what other foods have, put them into a chart and choose the same number of items accordingly.

The most important factor to remember is that there is nothing magic about a calorie limited diet based on food weight. In fact it can be a disaster if not done intelligently. Consider 1 kg of lard and 1 of lettuce and the problem becomes clear.

Just as important and perhaps more so is what one eats and the priming of the body for weight loss that increased physical activity provides. Amount of calories, what is eaten and priming the body with exercise for best results is the complete picture for healthy weight control.

For your consideration, "omer" is an ancient measure of volume not weight used for dry grain and the label applied to a diet based on weight is meaningless. The weight of an omer of dry grain exceeded two pounds or 1 kg considerably, its application in this instance not related to science but to another agenda irrelevant to the question.
outsorcitynet.net wrote: 1kg of the average mixed meal without overloading on single nutrients is around 1000 calories.

Untrue.

Would suggest you simply look up how much calories are in 1 kg of reconstituted baby formula which is mostly liquid. Alternatively, you may look up how many calories are in 1 kg of liquid food given to people through PEGs.

Here's why folks need the 2PD-OMER Approach:

groups.google/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/565dcf43b835714d?

May GOD continue to heal your heart, dear neighbor.

Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love,

Andrew -- Andrew B. Chung Cardiologist, Atlanta, Georgia, USA HeartMDPhD/HolySpirit
Name some other M.D.s or Ph.D.s who have their patients follow this approach. Hopefully they won't be modest and allow you to post their full names.
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote: outsorcitynet.net wrote: 1kg of the average mixed meal without overloading on single nutrients is around 1000 calories.

Untrue.

Would suggest you simply look up how much calories are in 1 kg of reconstituted baby formula which is mostly liquid. Alternatively, you may look up how many calories are in 1 kg of liquid food given to people through PEGs.



I highly doubt that many of us here are eating baby food or have PEGs.
  Read more

Medical Help Forum Index > Cardiology

Mortgage calculator, Credit Cards, Loans, Central London Hotels


Medical Information


Imprint